Language, speech & LLMs· 2014
Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networks
Encode once, decode a sequence.
On the reading lists
- #9 in the Top 500 (2026 edition)
- #9 of 100 papers to read in your lifetime (2026 edition)
- #2 in Language, speech & LLMs (2026 edition)
Why it matters
Established end-to-end encoder-decoder learning for mapping variable-length sequences to sequences.
Condensed from the expert lists' notes.
Inside the paper
- The problem
- A neural network normally expects inputs and outputs of fixed dimensions, while a translated sentence can be longer or shorter than its source. Learning such mappings without a task-specific alignment was an open challenge.
- The idea
- Use one recurrent network to summarize the input and another to generate the output, training both on paired sequences. The paper uses long short-term memory networks for this mapping.
- How it works
- The encoder reads the source tokens and passes its final state to a separate decoder as a representation of the sentence.
- The decoder predicts one target token at a time, conditioning on its state and the preceding target tokens.
- Training maximizes the probability of target sentences given their sources, and decoding uses beam search to explore candidate outputs.
- The authors reverse the source sentence during training and testing, shortening the distance between the beginning of each source and its translation.
- What it showed
- On English-to-French translation, the network achieves a strong BLEU score and improves a conventional system when used to rescore its candidates. Reversing the source substantially improves its results.
- Read it for
- Read Section 2 for the model and Section 3.3 for the reversal experiment, then look at Section 3.6 for the comparison. Section 3.5 on parallel training can be skimmed on a first pass.
Written in our own words from the paper itself. A draft the editors have not yet reviewed.
Reading it
Difficulty: Intermediate
Read this first: recurrent networks and LSTM.
The record
- First released
- 2014 (from arXiv 1409.3215)
- Citations
- 22,497 citations, as counted by Papers With Code (CC BY-SA 4.0)
- Awards
- NeurIPS Test of Time
- Named by
- both expert lists
- Also relevant to
- Deep learning
- Score
- 0.889 · computed rank 9 · consensus 0.94, must-read 1, citations percentile 0.878 (2010s · language), awards 1, existing lists 0.5. Method
Editor's notes
- Readability check: pass: Short paper that set the encoder-decoder template. (AI draft (Claude), not yet reviewed, 2026-10-29)
Data sources
Catalogue data from OpenAlex (CC0), Crossref (CC0 metadata; no abstracts are shown), arXiv, and Papers With Code (CC BY-SA 4.0). Each count names its source. See the method.