Back to the reading lists

    AI for science· 2018

    Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations

    Maziar Raissi (first author) · 2018 · published 2019

    Read the original

    DOI 10.1016/j.jcp.2018.10.045OpenAlex W2899283552

    Constrain solutions with physics.

    On the reading lists

    Why it matters

    Popularized embedding governing physical equations into neural-network training for scientific computing.

    Condensed from the expert lists' notes.

    Inside the paper

    The problem
    Measurements of physical systems can be expensive and sparse, making it hard to infer solutions or governing parameters from data alone. Existing approaches to nonlinear equations also faced restrictions from approximation choices and time discretization.
    The idea
    The authors train neural networks using both observed data and constraints derived from a governing differential equation. They present continuous-time and discrete-time formulations for prediction and for identifying unknown equation parameters.
    How it works
    • A network represents the unknown solution as a function of its coordinates, and automatic differentiation supplies the derivatives needed by the equation.
    • For continuous time, the loss combines mismatch to observed or boundary data with the equation residual at selected points.
    • For discrete time, a Runge–Kutta construction connects network outputs at different stages to observations at selected times.
    • In an inverse problem, unknown coefficients are trained alongside the network so that the inferred solution and equation fit the observations together.
    What it showed
    The paper reports experiments on several equations, including Schrödinger and Allen–Cahn examples for solution prediction and Navier–Stokes and Korteweg–de Vries examples for identification. These examples test the approach under particular data and noise settings rather than establishing a general guarantee.
    Read it for
    Read Section 2 for the problem setup and Section 3.1 for the continuous-time construction before inspecting Figure 1. Section 4 and Figure 3 show the inverse setting; the appendices contain further Burgers equation experiments and can be left for later.

    Written in our own words from the paper itself. A draft the editors have not yet reviewed.

    Reading it

    Difficulty: Intermediate

    Read this first: neural network basics (backpropagation); partial differential equations.

    The record

    First released
    2018 (from OpenAlex)
    Published
    2019
    Citations
    20,355 citations, as counted by OpenAlex (CC0)
    Named by
    both expert lists
    Score
    0.729 · computed rank 44 · consensus 0.97, must-read 1, citations percentile 0.964 (2010s · science), awards 0, existing lists 0. Method

    Editor's notes

    • Readability check: pass: A simple, lasting idea: put the physics in the loss. (AI draft (Claude), not yet reviewed, 2026-10-29)

    Data sources

    Catalogue data from OpenAlex (CC0), Crossref (CC0 metadata; no abstracts are shown), arXiv, and Papers With Code (CC BY-SA 4.0). Each count names its source. See the method.