Back to the reading lists

    Computer vision & multimodal· 2021

    Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learners

    Kaiming He (first author) · 2021 · published 2022

    Read the original

    arXiv 2111.06377OpenAlex W4226002507

    Visible patches restore the rest.

    On the reading lists

    Why it matters

    MAE demonstrated simple masked-pixel reconstruction as an effective, scalable vision pretraining objective.

    Condensed from the expert lists' notes.

    Inside the paper

    The problem
    Self-supervised pretraining had succeeded in language, but reconstructing missing image content faced a different challenge: nearby pixels can make small gaps too easy to fill. Large vision models also demand substantial training resources.
    The idea
    A masked autoencoder hides much of an image and learns to reconstruct the missing patches. Its encoder processes only visible patches, while a smaller decoder handles reconstruction.
    How it works
    • The image is split into patches and a random subset is withheld before the encoder sees the input.
    • The encoder processes the remaining patches; mask tokens are added later so the decoder has positions for the missing content.
    • The decoder predicts pixels for the patches, and the reconstruction loss is calculated on the masked patches.
    • After pretraining, the decoder is discarded and the encoder can be adapted to recognition tasks using complete images.
    What it showed
    The experiments find that a high masking ratio works well for this setup and that the asymmetric design reduces pretraining cost. The paper also reports transfer experiments on detection and segmentation as well as image classification.
    Read it for
    Figure 1 and Section 3 explain the architecture; Figures 2–3 show reconstructions and Section 4.1 tests the design choices. You can skim the transfer setup in Section 5 until you want to compare downstream tasks.

    Written in our own words from the paper itself. A draft the editors have not yet reviewed.

    Reading it

    Difficulty: Intermediate

    Read this first: An Image is Worth 16x16 Words (ViT); BERT.

    The record

    First released
    2021 (from arXiv 2111.06377)
    Published
    2022
    Citations
    13,175 citations, as counted by Papers With Code (CC BY-SA 4.0)
    Named by
    both expert lists
    Score
    0.669 · computed rank 90 · consensus 0.89, must-read 1, citations percentile 0.864 (2020s · vision), awards 0, existing lists 0. Method

    Editor's notes

    • Readability check: pass: Short and clear: masked prediction for images. (AI draft (Claude), not yet reviewed, 2026-10-29)

    Data sources

    Catalogue data from OpenAlex (CC0), Crossref (CC0 metadata; no abstracts are shown), arXiv, and Papers With Code (CC BY-SA 4.0). Each count names its source. See the method.