Back to the reading lists

    Search, retrieval & recommendation· 2020

    Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answering

    Vladimir Karpukhin (first author) · 2020

    Read the original

    DOI 10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.550arXiv 2004.04906OpenAlex W3015883388

    Questions meet passages as vectors.

    On the reading lists

    Why it matters

    Established dense dual-encoder retrieval as a practical alternative to lexical passage search.

    Condensed from the expert lists' notes.

    Inside the paper

    The problem
    Open-domain question answering usually first retrieves a small set of passages and then asks a reader to extract an answer. Keyword retrieval can miss relevant passages when the question and evidence use different words.
    The idea
    The authors train separate neural encoders for questions and passages so that useful pairs have similar dense representations. Precomputed passage vectors make it possible to search the collection before running a more expensive reader.
    How it works
    • Encode each question and passage into a vector using separate BERT-based encoders, and score a pair with their inner product.
    • Train on questions paired with relevant passages, contrasting each positive passage with negative examples, including passages associated with other questions in the batch.
    • Encode the passage collection ahead of time and use maximum inner product search to retrieve candidates for a new question.
    • A reader examines the retrieved passages and predicts an answer span, allowing the authors to test the retriever within a complete question-answering system.
    What it showed
    The paper reports higher passage retrieval accuracy than its BM25 baseline across the evaluated question-answering datasets. It also reports end-to-end answer accuracy and investigates training choices, including the contribution of negative passages.
    Read it for
    Read Section 3 for the encoders and training objective, then Tables 2 and 3 in Section 5 for retrieval results and training comparisons. Section 6 covers the reader; the dataset inventory in Section 4 can be skimmed initially.

    Written in our own words from the paper itself. A draft the editors have not yet reviewed.

    Reading it

    Difficulty: Intermediate

    Read this first: BERT; information retrieval basics (TF-IDF, BM25).

    The record

    First released
    2020 (from arXiv 2004.04906)
    Citations
    7,327 citations, as counted by Papers With Code (CC BY-SA 4.0)
    Named by
    both expert lists
    Also relevant to
    Language, speech & LLMs
    Score
    0.660 · computed rank 96 · consensus 0.7, must-read 1, citations percentile 1 (2020s · retrieval), awards 0, existing lists 0. Method

    Editor's notes

    • Readability check: pass: Clear introduction to dense retrieval. (AI draft (Claude), not yet reviewed, 2026-10-29)

    Data sources

    Catalogue data from OpenAlex (CC0), Crossref (CC0 metadata; no abstracts are shown), arXiv, and Papers With Code (CC BY-SA 4.0). Each count names its source. See the method.