Machine learning foundations· 2019
Deep Double Descent: Where Bigger Models and More Data Hurt
DOI 10.1088/1742-5468/ac3a74arXiv 1912.02292OpenAlex W2994081359
On the reading lists
- #70 in Machine learning foundations (2026 edition)
Why it matters
Demonstrated double descent across network width, training duration, and dataset size.
Condensed from the expert lists' notes.
The record
- First released
- 2019 (from arXiv 1912.02292)
- Citations
- 1,213 citations, as counted by Papers With Code (CC BY-SA 4.0)
- Named by
- both expert lists
- Also relevant to
- Deep learning
- Score
- 0.278 · computed rank 660 · consensus 0.13, must-read 0.5, citations percentile 0.541 (2010s · foundations), awards 0, existing lists 0. Method
Data sources
Catalogue data from OpenAlex (CC0), Crossref (CC0 metadata; no abstracts are shown), arXiv, and Papers With Code (CC BY-SA 4.0). Each count names its source. See the method.