Safety, alignment & interpretability· 2017
Counterfactual Explanations Without Opening the Black Box: Automated Decisions and the GDPR
DOI 10.2139/ssrn.3063289arXiv 1711.00399OpenAlex W2765204106
On the reading lists
- #312 in the Top 500 (2026 edition)
- #36 in Safety, alignment & interpretability (2026 edition)
Why it matters
Established counterfactual explanations as actionable alternatives to revealing model internals.
Condensed from the expert lists' notes.
The record
- First released
- 2017 (from arXiv 1711.00399)
- Citations
- 3,543 citations, as counted by
Semantic Scholar (non-commercial licence) - Named by
- both expert lists
- Score
- 0.437 · computed rank 312 · consensus 0.6, must-read 0, citations percentile 0.734 (2010s · safety), awards 0, existing lists 0. Method
Data sources
Catalogue data from OpenAlex (CC0), Crossref (CC0 metadata; no abstracts are shown), arXiv, and Papers With Code (CC BY-SA 4.0), and
Semantic Scholar (used under its non-commercial API licence). Each count names its source. See the method.