Safety, alignment & interpretability· 2018
AI safety via debate
On the reading lists
- #64 in Safety, alignment & interpretability (2026 edition)
Why it matters
Proposed adversarial debate between AI agents to help humans supervise complex decisions.
Condensed from the expert lists' notes.
The record
- First released
- 2018 (from arXiv 1805.00899)
- Citations
- 496 citations, as counted by Papers With Code (CC BY-SA 4.0)
- Named by
- both expert lists
- Score
- 0.284 · computed rank 643 · consensus 0.52, must-read 0.5, citations percentile 0.223 (2010s · safety), awards 0, existing lists 0. Method
Data sources
Catalogue data from OpenAlex (CC0), Crossref (CC0 metadata; no abstracts are shown), arXiv, and Papers With Code (CC BY-SA 4.0). Each count names its source. See the method.